TULA assume that we face a huge challenge to try, since " within capitalism, exposing its contradictions once they no margins or "outside" to this effect. The task of those who aim at abolishing classes becomes more difficult, like going back to the categories that reflect basic social relations of capitalism and allow us to understand our own practice, developed and enriched from the movement of the capital with the aim of confronting the real "industry of every aspect / detail of life "that fits the spot where we experience our daily life.
So then extract fragments with definitions that are not meant to be dogmas or crystallized thinking, but categories that refer to elements present in our reality but as a back hidden impossible to understand (and therefore act) wage slavery. No talk of "inventions" or "new academic ", not of theories away from any practice but rather, critical theorizing about core elements existing in all that we call capitalism. His exhibition is aimed directly linked to the experience, so that what we present below is not a pure "reading to repeat", but a practical incorporation into everyday consciousness, inciting to riot here and there.
only make clear that this is not intended as a manual, but a challenge to a recognition of what we do with what has been theorized, by way of obtaining a broad and rich to understand more vividly how we exploit and dominate; to continue testing methods in return antagonistic to the existing, leaving no time for a "right time", but this is the time, and what we do is a lesson we need today for a company that deserves to be destroyed before it is over with us
** Excerpted from Communism
Fuzzy No. 1 paper and soon the streets.
"The most important and true concepts of the age are conditioned to be organized around them the greatest confusion and worse contradictions. The vital concepts familiar to most real time applications and more liars "(Situationist International, 1966) Communism One words more soiled by the story from the degeneration of the Russian Revolution of 1917, to the point that we speak of "common state" to refer, for example, the system of capitalist exploitation that is applied in China (we prefer to speak of " Stalinism "to refer to this form of capitalist domination
commune is Communism, and designates a non-alienated human community or by work or by the State. Most of its history of mankind lived in the so-called" primitive communism " to the rise of classes and separate powers of the community.
Sometime Marx said that communism is not an ideal state to achieve some day, but "the real movement which abolishes / subverts existing conditions." In this sense "there is now, not as a company already established, but an effort, as a task to prepare. It is the movement that tends to abolish the conditions of life determined by wage labor, and let them effectively abolished by the revolution "(Dauvé). Thus we speak of a "diffuse Communism" which has never ceased to exist.
So were "communists" all movements, since the rise of classes and the state, pointing to its destruction, albeit sometimes unconsciously expressed in a language or messianic, religious or utopian. For as the current insurrectionary states, "a break in the continuous reproduction of this system of exploitation and oppression has always been possible" (Killing King Abacus)
In both unitary and anti-movement, communism is by definition anarchic. Although for many Marxists denounce capitalism is the "anarchy of production", to us Anarchy is the ongoing struggle against the state and all separate power. And like communism is a matter of being "(Invariant, 1969)
Perhaps the best recent definition of communism is this:
" Any economic definition of communism is still within the sphere of the economy, ie the separation of the moments of the production from the rest of life. Communism is not a society that properly feed the hungry, take care of the sick, it would house who has no home, etc.. Can not be based on meeting needs as they exist now or as we might imagine in the future. Communism does not produce enough for everyone and distributes it equally among us. It is a world in which people enter into relationships and actions (among other things) result to be able to feed, care, housing ... themselves. Communism is not an organization social. Is an activity. It is a human community "
Decline and Resurgence of the Communist perspective. Introduction to the 2002 edition.
communization: "The term immediately evokes a number of revolutionary social experiments and attempts from the Paris Commune and the utopian socialist communities in the 19 th century a number of counter-cultural attempts to rebuild social relations in a more community level such as the squat scene in the 70's and 80's. Tiquun trend, known as "The Invisible Committee" after the next book, The Uprising, available in full chaosmosis-site is based on this long history of antagonism secessionist. They see the communization as being essentially the production, through the formation of "communes" of collective forms of radical subjectivity. This disrupts the production of subjectivity and value both within the capital and more traditional forms of political organization, eventually leading to a break insurrection. The "Comunne" in this version is not necessarily a bunch of hippies aspiring to be free of contaminants.
In "The insurgency coming," a municipality is all that "seeks to destroy any and all domination economic dependence policy ", from the wildcat strikes at Radio Alice in Bologna in 1977. Without completely losing the point, there is a risk in this position to obscure the specificity of "communization" in both concept and form of praxis which, as noted Enanotes, emerged within the medium post68 ultra leftist and later in insurrectionary anarchism through Alfredo Bonanno. A minimal definition of communization could be, as formulated Dauvé and Francois Martin in 1972, the following:
"Communism is not a set of measures to put into practice after the seizure of power .... All were able to move past society to take a break and wait something arising out of this paralysis universal. Communization, by contrast, circulating goods regardless of money, open doors that isolate the factories of their surroundings, closed factories where the work process is too alienating to be improved, eliminated the school understood as a specialized center for adolescents in which dissociates the theory of praxis, toppled the walls that force people to live with the family locked in cells of three rooms, in short, will tend to eliminate all gaps ... "
From a text John Cunningham on "Introduction to Contemporary communization", taken from translated and slightly www.libcom.org modified.
Note: We also add a definition of "communization: a 'call' and an 'invitation'
Posted in Troploin, September 2004" Taken from communization
"Talk of communization is to say that the coming revolution will be meaningless emancipatory no chance of success unless deployment since its inception a communist transformation at all levels, from food production to how to eat, to how we move, where we live, how we learn, travel, read, the way we deliver leisure, love and hate, argue and decide our future, etc.. This process does not replace, but rather accompanies and reinforces the destruction (necessarily violent) the state and political institutions that underpin the commodity and wage exploitation. This transformation, which will be a planetary scale, certainly extend over generations, but it depends on have been previously created the foundation for a future society, intended to proceed only after a more or less long phase of " transition. " This transformation would not be a mere consequence of the conquest (or demolition) of political power, which then would lead to social disorder. She would Otherwise what the formula summarizes Victor Serge (then Bolsheviks), who wrote in 1921: "Every revolution is a sacrifice made on behalf of the future [2]. To put it positively: not just about doing, but to be the revolution.
[1] R. Simon, BP 17, 84300 Vignères them. [Http://theoriecommuniste.communisat ...]
[2] Les Anarchistes et l'expérience de la Révolution russe, 1921, reprinted in Mémoires d'un révolutionnaire Laffont, coll. Books.
Proletariat: expression that comes from Roman Empire, a class society where it is called "proletariat" who had no property but provided with their offspring ("children") as cannon fodder for the armies. The most notable proletarian hero this time was Spartacus.
In the era of modern capitalism (which comes more or less at the end of the sixteenth century but only in the nineteenth century ultimately prevails and globally), proletarians are those who are forced to sell their labor to stay alive (since, as The Hunchbacked expressed in his song "state of tension" of something you have to live!, and as comrades said the Situationists, the alternative for the majority of mankind today is dying of hunger, or boredom)
Since the proletariat lives by working, even his "spare time" is part of modern slavery, because only you can use it to regain strength and continue working. Both those who are outside the labor market (unemployed and prisoners) as primary and secondary students and so-called "staves of each" are also specific sectors of the proletariat in the social fabric that stretches across earth's surface.
has long dominated the idea that the proletariat is defined in a positive sense: a person who produces surplus value (absolute or relative) to a capitalist. But when The revolutionary proletariat is defined rather by its negativity: the kind that can reject capitalist domination in block, and that by destroying the last class society in history is also destroyed himself. Again, Dauvé has said before and better: if you identify proletariat laborer, worker, then there is what is subversive about the condition of the proletariat. The proletariat is the negation of this society.
Note: add at this point a critique of the idea of \u200b\u200bconfusing proletariat laborer. Excerpted from notebooks No. denial that in turn is derived from www.ing-soc.blogspot.com
"The worker is a form of capitalist ideology, endemic among self-identified revolutionary. It is an ideology that promotes the acceptance of labor-income ratio among individuals who have realized the exploitation they entail. It is, therefore, one of the highest forms of alienation. The reverence for the worker is found in several statist ideologies, such as Stalinism and Nazism. The workers are honored for their role as builders of the nation, the state and capital. Venerated Workerism manual labor, "work with hammers." His vision of the proletariat is the "muscle man." By the rejection of commercial and office work, rejects a large part of wage earners, revealing himself also as sexist. The worker has been in the labor movement since the beginning. The first workers' societies, of Christian inspiration, honesty and revered work. This moralism is adjacent to the worker, the remaining bastion of Christian ideology in the labor movement. [...]
Workerism deals with the historical failure of his theory by correcting his theory but through the falsification of history, in each case the role played by non-workers is denied or minimized. Revolutionary theory instead analyzes the actual events and then understand the moments of weakness in capitalism. Production workers as the workers remain a crucial position because it can, leaving work, destroy capitalism. In fact their importance is overrated, because the production is only part of the cycle cumulative value. Workers in the fields of communication and distribution are also a powerful force. A strike by bank workers can have a major effect on the capital of auto workers. In turn, a wave of urban unrest may have more effect than both together. The search key factions within the proletariat, whose struggle to look inside reveals the hierarchical perspective that keeps the workers. Arises from the view that communism is a program that framed and troops only needs to be done. This reflects the hangover of the old socialism for the 2nd and 3rd international in its social aspects, Leninist or members. This theory sees the class struggle as a war (bourgeois) with soldiers and generals. Determines the professional revolutionary worker program and put it into practice. Workerism and intellectualism are opposite but not opposed, they complement each other, thought and action are separated, workers are putting the theoretical ideas into practice. Workerists often have their own critique of intellectuals and not the workers themselves. The revolutionary subject are not productive workers, or even the workers, the proletariat, those without social power or economic capital, they have nothing to lose but their chains. In addition, non-proletarian strata can play a fully active role in a revolutionary context if the proletariat itself is active. The goal of the communist movement, then, is to achieve the state of workers: the abolition of all social classes to achieve the human community, created by the struggle against capitalism. "
Sabotage: Practice direct offensive against the dictatorship of capital in all areas of our life, arising from the subjectivity and balancing individual subjectivities spontaneous revolt as a "third force" (Vaneigem), in a place and time, against the commodification of human life and nature and the false answers of bureaucratic politics of parties, unions and their " democracy. " The name comes from some wooden shoes called "Sabots", which in France were used by workers to destroy machinery.
Unlike the "terrorism" (professionalization of sabotage with a load militaristic, hierarchical and centralized), which includes all forms mean daily (abuse of telephones, printers, copiers, consumption and expropriation of goods, theft ant, spoiling production machines and control systems, etc.). and not only the most explicit attacks (burning, looting and stone throwing against clear targets, destruction of private and public street furniture, damage to locks butcher shops and places of exploitation, diversion of advertising, etc.). but all types of active or passive, conscious or unconscious of REJECTION. One of the most important characteristics of dispersed sabotage is invisibility, flexibility and minimal risk, and that regeneration of the groups is constant and very difficult to identify by the police, due to the lack of a leader and an organization in the typical sense.
The sabotage does not ensure the collapse of the entire system, but allows the release of negative energy in our body / psyche, as well as extending the possibilities of a direct answer and even playful.
sabotage Other historical practices are found in the Luddites, the "proletarian rounds" of the nineteenth and actions of the Russian peasants against the Stalinist forced industrialization in the last century, but just look a little everywhere to find many current forms not always so obvious.
a the founding of the Association 
